Article

상황 제시를 이용한 윤리적 갈등상황에 대한 전공의의 인식 조사

이영미1, 이영희1, 이미정2, 박재영3, 임기영4, 최창민5, 김형규6,*
Young-Mee Lee1, Young Hee Lee1, Mee Jeong Lee2, Jaeyoung Park3, Ki-Young Lim4, Chang-Min Choi5, Hyung Kyu Kim6,*
Author Information & Copyright
1고려대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실
2단국대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실
3청년의사
4아주대학교 의과대학 정신과학교실
5울산 대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
6고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
1Department of Medical Education, Korea University College of Medicine
2Department of Medical Education, Dankook University Medical College
3‘The Korean Doctors’ Weekly
4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Ajou University School of Medicine
5Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University College of Medicine
6Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine
*교신저자 : 김형규. 고려대학교 의과대학 내과학교실. 02-920-5315. hyoung@korera.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2010 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 10, 2010; Accepted: Jun 01, 2010

Published Online: Jun 30, 2010

ABSTRACT

Background

The importance and recognition of medical ethics and professionalism has been growing. However, in Korea it is widely thought that there is still an insufficient amount of medical ethics education during resident training. The purpose of this study was to identify residents’ ethical sensitivity and coping strategies on ethical conflicts that can occur in clinical practice and research settings.

Method

The survey was conducted in 16 university-based or affiliated hospitals; a total of 1,187 residents participated in the survey. A questionnaire was developed consisting of 18 questions including 7 question areas concerning residents’ perspectives on ethical conflicts and professional boundaries in clinical practice or research. The seven question areas were as follows: coping and reporting mistakes (2 items), responding to impaired colleagues (2 items), relationship with colleagues, senior residents, and faculty (4 items), balancing personal and professional life (2 items), family (relatives) and friends’ requests (2 items), relationships with patients and their family members (3 items), clinical research ethics (3 items). For each item, a vignette was developed on the basis of situations derived from the authors’ educational and clinical experiences. To facilitate the participants’ response, 4 or 5 answer options, as well a space to for open responses, were provided for each question.

Results

A total of 1,072 samples (male 65.9%, female 34.1%) were analyzed. The majority of the respondents answered that if a medical mistake happens, they will report it to a faculty member and follow their instructions. Regarding impaired colleagues who may threaten patient safety, more than 70% of respondents answered that they will resolve the problem among residents themselves rather than notify a faculty member or resolve it officially. More than half of the respondents also said that if they observe non-professional or unethical conduct by either faculty members or residents, they will solve the problem by consulting with colleagues. However, more than 60% of the residents responded that they would put priority on patient care when facing conflicts between medical services and personal life. In questions about research ethics, the majority of respondents answered that they would maintain truth in managing data and research results.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that medical ethics and professionalism curricula during residency should be strengthened to develop residents’ ethical sensitivity and coping strategies concerning ethical conflicts in either clinical practice or research.

Keywords: 의료윤리; 전공의; 윤리적 갈등상황; 인식
Keywords: medical ethics; residents; ethical dilemmas; attitude


한국의료윤리학회지 28권 2호 모집


한국의료윤리학회지는 1997년에 창립된 한국의료윤리학회의 공식 학술지이자 한국연구재단 등재학술지로서, 임상현장에서의 윤리, 의료윤리교육, 그리고 의학 및 생명공학 기술 발전으로 제기된 삶과 생명 문제에 대한 윤리적 ∙ 철학적 ∙ 법적 ∙ 사회적 성찰에 대한 여러 분야 연구자들의 학술연구 결과를 게재하고 있습니다.

 

■ 투고 형식 안내 ■

1. 주제

임상윤리, 의료윤리교육 및 생의학에서의 윤리 ∙ 철학 ∙ 법 ∙ 사회학과 관련된 주제이면서 다른 학술지에 발표되지 않은 글

 

2. 모집 기간

~ 2025년 4월 30일 수요일

 

자세한 내용은 아래의 공지사항 확인을 부탁드립니다.

감사합니다.

 

공지사항 링크


I don't want to open this window for a day.