Article

심폐소생술 불필요(DN(A)R) 동의 취득에 대한 전공의 의식조사

이태림1, 신태건1, 심민섭1,*, 조익준1, 송형곤1, 송근정1, 정연권1, 최병인2
Tae Rim LEE1, Tae Gun SHIN1, Min Seob SIM1,*, Ik Joon JO1, Hyoung Gon SONG1, Keun Jeong SONG1, Yeon Kwon JEONG1, B.I CHOE2
Author Information & Copyright
1성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 응급의학과
2가톨릭대학교 생명대학원 임상연구윤리학과
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
2Department of Institutional Review Ethics, Nicholas Cardinal Cheong Graduate School for Life, The Catholic University of Korea
*교신저자: 심민섭. 삼성서울병원 응급의학과. 02-3410-6537. coldco2@naver.com

ⓒ Copyright 2011 The Korean Society for Medical Ethics. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 19, 2011; Accepted: Sep 16, 2011

Published Online: Sep 30, 2011

ABSTRACT

This survey, which was conducted over the course of 3 months in 2009, was designed to investigate what the medical residents of one university hospital in Seoul think about DNAR orders. A total of 214 out of 468 residents (45.7%) answered the questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups according to their experiences with taking DNAR order. There was no difference between the two groups on the definition of DNAR, its limitations, and when to issue DNAR orders. However, the two groups showed different opinions concerning who should be consulted in obtaining consent for DNAR and whether or not it was necessary to review DNAR orders. Residents who were experienced in giving DNAR orders felt more inclined to discuss the situation with the patient’s family members rather than the patient herself and thought that DNAR orders would not need to be reconsidered. These differences in opinion may result from the different experiences the two groups of residents had in actually ordering DNAR in the clinical setting. This study shows that more research and discussion is needed in order to establish the limitations and precise definition of DNAR orders.

Keywords: 서면동의; 의사결정능력; 타당도 연구
Keywords: terminal patient; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNAR; resident's view


한국의료윤리학회지 28권 2호 모집


한국의료윤리학회지는 1997년에 창립된 한국의료윤리학회의 공식 학술지이자 한국연구재단 등재학술지로서, 임상현장에서의 윤리, 의료윤리교육, 그리고 의학 및 생명공학 기술 발전으로 제기된 삶과 생명 문제에 대한 윤리적 ∙ 철학적 ∙ 법적 ∙ 사회적 성찰에 대한 여러 분야 연구자들의 학술연구 결과를 게재하고 있습니다.

 

■ 투고 형식 안내 ■

1. 주제

임상윤리, 의료윤리교육 및 생의학에서의 윤리 ∙ 철학 ∙ 법 ∙ 사회학과 관련된 주제이면서 다른 학술지에 발표되지 않은 글

 

2. 모집 기간

~ 2025년 4월 30일 수요일

 

자세한 내용은 아래의 공지사항 확인을 부탁드립니다.

감사합니다.

 

공지사항 링크


I don't want to open this window for a day.