PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 1 Article
Metrics (View:2,974)- Ethical Debates on Physicians Strikes around the World
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Reinforcing Professionalism through Medical Ethics Education Based on Arete
Korean J Med Ethics 2021;24(4):409-422.
Using Delphi surveys to identify the core competencies of medical ethics for inclusion in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
Korean J Med Ethics 2020;23(2):81-97.
The Future of Medical Ethics from an Engineering Perspective: Treatment or Repair?*
Korean J Med Ethics 2019;22(3):274-286.
A Three-fold Approach to Medical Ethics Education That Combines Quantitative and Qualitative Reasoning
Korean J Med Ethics 2018;21(3):241-261.
Exploration of the Biomedical Ethics Education Module Used in the UNESCO Bioethics Core Curriculum
Korean J Med Ethics 2016;19(3):282-296.
세계의 의사파업에 대한 윤리적 논쟁
Published Online: Dec 31, 2001
ABSTRACT
Physicians in Korea have strongly opposed the government policy separating prescription and dispensation and have protested its implementation by staging two nation-wide strikes in 2000. These strikes have in turn evoked a hostile response from Korean citizens, who regard the physicians as acting from purely selfish motives. Within this context a debate has been initiated on the ethics of physicians’ strikes. At the heart of this debate is the following question: Are physicians' strikes ethically acceptable means of protesting government policies? The purpose of this paper is to introduce the arguments that have been given on both sides of this debate about physicians' strikes in the world within several decades. To achieve this purpose, this paper includes the following: 1) the background of physicians strikes around the world 2) the reasons and results of physicians, strikes in the various countries，and 3) the pros and cons of physicians' strikes around the world.